Removing an Executor: How to Apply to the Court

Dealing with an executor who will not act — or who is acting against the estate's interests? Removing an executor is a serious step, but the law provides clear mechanisms where removal is justified. BundleCreator.co helps you prepare a court bundle built around CPR Part 57 and the Chancery Guide for executor removal applications, with pre-loaded templates and automatic pagination — so the court can focus on the substance of your application rather than the presentation.

When Can an Executor Be Removed?

Being named as executor in a will carries significant legal responsibilities. An executor is a fiduciary — they owe duties of care, loyalty, and impartiality to the beneficiaries. When they fail in those duties, the beneficiaries are not without remedy.

However, the courts do not remove executors lightly. The testator chose that person for a reason, and the court will respect that choice unless there are compelling grounds to intervene. In Kershaw v Micklethwaite [2010] EWHC 506 (Ch), Newey J applied the approach in Letterstedt v Broers (1884) 9 App Cas 371 to executors: the main guide is the welfare of the beneficiaries ([7]); friction or hostility is not of itself a reason for removal ([11]); and the testator's choice of executor is relevant ([13]–[14]).

The Legal Framework

Two principal statutory provisions govern executor removal:

In addition, the court retains an inherent jurisdiction to remove executors where the administration of the estate is being endangered.

---

Grounds for Removing an Executor

The case law has identified a number of grounds on which the court may remove an executor. These are not exhaustive — the court considers all the circumstances — but the following are the most commonly relied upon.

1. Failure to Administer the Estate

The most straightforward ground. If an executor is failing to take the basic steps required to administer the estate — applying for the grant, collecting assets, paying debts, distributing to beneficiaries — and has been given reasonable opportunity and encouragement to do so, the court may remove them.

What the court looks for:

• Has the executor been asked to act and failed or refused?
• How long has the delay been? (A personal representative is not bound to distribute before one year from the death (Administration of Estates Act 1925 s.44); unexplained delay beyond that calls for explanation.)
• Is there a reason for the delay — for example, a genuine dispute about the will's validity?
• Have the beneficiaries suffered prejudice as a result of the delay?

Evidence to include in your bundle:

• Correspondence requesting the executor to act (letters, emails, solicitors' letters)
• Chronology of the estate administration showing the delay
• Evidence of assets deteriorating or being put at risk by inaction
• Any responses (or non-responses) from the executor

2. Misappropriation of Estate Assets

Where an executor has used estate assets for their own benefit, or has failed to account for assets under their control, the court will take a particularly serious view. This may also give rise to separate claims for breach of fiduciary duty and an account of profits.

Evidence to include in your bundle:

• Bank statements showing estate funds being transferred to the executor's personal accounts
• Evidence of estate property being sold below market value to connected parties
• The executor's failure to provide estate accounts when requested
• Any admissions or explanations given by the executor

3. Conflict of Interest

An executor who is also a beneficiary, a debtor of the estate, or a party to litigation with the estate may face an irreconcilable conflict of interest. The conflict must be real and substantial — the mere fact that an executor is a beneficiary is not, in itself, a ground for removal, since testators frequently appoint beneficiaries as executors.

What makes the conflict actionable:

• The executor is making decisions that favour their own interest over other beneficiaries
• The executor is a party to proceedings against the estate (for example, a claim that the testator owed them money)
• The executor is refusing to pursue a claim that the estate has against them personally

4. Hostility and Breakdown of Relations

Where the relationship between the executor and the beneficiaries has broken down to such an extent that the executor can no longer administer the estate effectively, the court may intervene. This is particularly common in blended family situations, where the surviving spouse is the executor and the children from a previous relationship are the residuary beneficiaries.

The court will not remove an executor merely because the beneficiaries dislike them or disagree with their decisions. The hostility must be at a level that is genuinely impeding the administration of the estate.

Evidence to include in your bundle:

• Correspondence demonstrating the breakdown in relations
• Evidence that the executor is refusing to communicate with beneficiaries or their solicitors
• Examples of unreasonable conduct by the executor
• Evidence that the administration of the estate has stalled as a result

5. Incapacity

If an executor has become mentally or physically incapable of acting, the court may remove them and appoint a substitute. This may arise where the executor has developed dementia, suffered a serious illness, or has been declared bankrupt (which does not automatically disqualify an executor but may be relevant).

6. Criminal Conduct

An executor who has been convicted of dishonesty offences, or who is under investigation for conduct related to the estate, may be removed on the basis that their continued appointment is incompatible with the proper administration of the estate.

---

The Court Application Process

Which Court?

Applications to remove an executor are made under CPR 57.13. They may be issued in:

• The High Court, Chancery Division (Business and Property Division from 1 October 2026) — all s.50 claims (CPR 57.13(2)), in London or at a Chancery District Registry.

The Claim Form

The application is made by claim form (or application in existing proceedings: CPR 57.13(5)). The claim form must:

• Identify the deceased and the estate
• Name the executor sought to be removed
• Set out the grounds for removal
• Identify the proposed substitute personal representative (if applicable)
• Be supported by a witness statement setting out the evidence
• Include a sealed or certified copy of the grant (or the will, if before a grant), written evidence of the grounds with the estate information in PD 57 para 13.1, and, for a substitute, a signed consent to act and independent evidence of fitness (PD 57 para 13.2; Chancery Guide para 23.26)

Who Should Be Named as a Party?

The Witness Statement

The witness statement in support of the application is the most important document in the bundle. It must:

1. Set out the factual background — the testator's death, the will, the estate, and the relationship between the parties
2. Detail the grounds for removal — with specific examples, dates, and documentary evidence
3. Explain the prejudice to the beneficiaries — how the executor's conduct is harming the estate or delaying distribution
4. Propose a solution — who should be appointed as substitute, and why they are suitable
5. Address the testator's wishes — acknowledge that the testator chose this executor and explain why removal is nonetheless justified

What the Court Considers

In deciding whether to remove an executor, the court weighs:

• The testator's wishes — the starting point is respect for the testator's choice
• The welfare of the beneficiaries — the main guide (Letterstedt v Broers, applied in Kershaw at [7])
• The proper administration of the estate — is the estate being administered effectively?
• The gravity of the grounds — how serious is the executor's misconduct or failure?
• Whether lesser measures would suffice — could the court give directions to the executor rather than removing them?
• The cost and disruption of removal — particularly if the estate administration is well advanced

---

Structuring Your Bundle

A well-organised bundle for an executor removal application should follow this structure:

Section A: Court Documents

• Claim form (usually Part 8, as s.50 claims rarely involve a substantial dispute of fact: CPR 8.1(2); Chancery Guide para 23.27), or application notice in existing proceedings (CPR 57.13(5))
• Any acknowledgment of service or defence
• Court orders and directions
• Draft order sought

Section B: Testamentary Documents

• The deceased's will
• Grant of probate (if issued)
• Any earlier wills (if relevant to the executor's appointment)

Section C: Witness Evidence

• Claimant's witness statement (with exhibits)
• Any witness statements from other beneficiaries
• The executor's witness statement in response (if filed)

Section D: Estate Administration Documents

• Estate accounts (or evidence of the executor's failure to provide them)
• Correspondence with the executor requesting action
• Correspondence between solicitors
• Bank statements showing estate transactions
• Property valuations and asset schedules

Section E: Correspondence Chronology

• A chronological bundle of all relevant correspondence
• Letters before action
• Solicitors' correspondence
• The executor's responses (or record of non-responses)

Section F: Proposed Substitute

• CV or statement from the proposed substitute personal representative
• Their consent to act
• Evidence of their suitability (professional qualifications, independence, etc.)

Bundle tip: A clear chronology is often the most persuasive element of an executor removal application. The court needs to see the pattern of delay, non-communication, or misconduct over time. BundleCreator.co allows you to create a dedicated chronology section with documents in date order, automatically paginated and cross-referenced in the index.

---

Alternatives to Removal

Before applying to remove an executor, consider whether a less drastic remedy might achieve the same result:

Directions from the Court

Under CPR Part 64, the court can give directions for the administration of the estate without removing the executor. For example, the court might order the executor to:

• Provide estate accounts within a specified period
• Sell a particular asset
• Make an interim distribution to beneficiaries
• Appoint a solicitor to assist with the administration

Appointment of a Co-Executor

In some cases, the court may appoint an additional personal representative to act alongside the existing executor, rather than removing them. This can be appropriate where the executor is willing but overwhelmed, or where an independent professional is needed to manage a specific aspect of the estate.

Citation to Accept or Refuse Probate

If an executor who has been named in the will has not applied for the grant and shows no sign of doing so, a citation can be issued through the Probate Registry requiring them to accept or renounce their appointment within a specified period. If they fail to respond, the person issuing the citation may apply for a grant to themselves or for an order requiring the executor to take a grant (NCPR r.47(5)).

Mediation

As with all contentious probate disputes, the court expects parties to have considered mediation before proceeding to a contested hearing. Mediation can be particularly effective in executor removal cases, where the underlying issues are often about communication, trust, and family dynamics rather than legal principle.

---

Costs

The general rule is that costs follow the event, but in estate proceedings the court has a broader discretion. Where the executor's own misconduct has necessitated the application, the court may order the executor to pay costs personally (rather than from the estate). Conversely, where the application fails, the unsuccessful applicant may be ordered to pay the executor's costs.

---

How BundleCreator.co Can Help

Executor removal applications require careful, methodical presentation of evidence — often spanning years of correspondence, estate accounts, and witness testimony. BundleCreator.co takes the mechanical burden off your shoulders:

• Automatic consecutive pagination across all sections
• Indexed table of contents reflecting your bundle structure
• Chronological document ordering with drag-and-drop organisation
• PDF merging of scanned correspondence, bank statements, and estate documents
• Electronic bookmarks for Chancery Division e-filing requirements
• Pre-loaded templates for witness statements and estate schedules

Whether you are a beneficiary frustrated by years of delay, a solicitor acting for a concerned family, or a professional trustee seeking to replace a failing co-executor, BundleCreator.co helps you build a bundle designed to follow the Chancery Division's bundle guidance so your case can be presented clearly.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an executor be removed simply because the beneficiaries do not like them?

No. Personal animosity is not, in itself, a ground for removal. The testator chose the executor, and the court respects that choice. Removal requires evidence that the executor's conduct — or the breakdown in relations — is genuinely impeding the proper administration of the estate. Mere disagreement over the pace of administration or the value of assets is unlikely to be sufficient.

What happens to the estate whilst the application is pending?

The executor remains in office until the court orders otherwise. However, the court may make interim orders — for example, restraining the executor from making distributions, requiring them to provide accounts, or appointing a receiver (or, while a probate claim is pending, an administrator pending suit under Senior Courts Act 1981 s.117: PD 57 para 8) to protect estate assets. If there is an urgent risk to estate assets, you can apply for interim relief on short notice.

Can an executor remove themselves voluntarily?

An executor who has not taken a grant can usually renounce using form PA15; one who has already acted in the estate ("intermeddled") may be unable to renounce and should take advice. After a grant, release requires a court order under s.50 AJA 1985. In practice, if all parties agree, a consent order can be obtained relatively quickly and cheaply.

What if there are two executors and only one is failing in their duties?

The application can seek to remove one co-executor whilst leaving the other in place. The remaining executor can then continue to administer the estate alone. If the remaining executor also needs assistance, the court can appoint an additional personal representative to act alongside them.

How long does an executor removal application take?

Timescales vary depending on the court's listing availability and whether the application is contested. In most s.50 claims oral evidence is only needed exceptionally (Chancery Guide para 23.27).

Can a professional executor (such as a bank or solicitor) be removed?

Yes. Professional executors are held to the same — and arguably higher — standards as lay executors. Failure to administer the estate with reasonable diligence, excessive charging, or conflicts of interest can all justify removal. The court may be more willing to remove a professional executor who has charged substantial fees without making meaningful progress than a lay executor who is simply out of their depth.

Do I need to propose a substitute before applying?

It is strongly advisable. The court will want to know who will administer the estate if the executor is removed. The proposed substitute should be someone who is willing and able to act, who is independent of the dispute, and who has the confidence of the beneficiaries. A professional executor (such as a solicitor or accountant) is often preferred, particularly where family relationships are fractured.

---

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Executor removal applications involve complex procedural and evidential issues; you should seek specialist legal advice before taking any steps. References to legislation and case law are to the law as it stood on 27 September 2026.