Skip to main content
BundleCreator.co

"Professional bundles for IP disputes"

Intellectual Property Litigation Bundle Software

Create bundles formatted to CPR Part 63 requirements for the Patents Court, IPEC, and Chancery Division. Patent infringement, trade mark disputes, copyright claims, design rights, and confidential information proceedings.

Every stop on the journey produces a real document — template, form or hearing bundle

How do I prepare an intellectual property litigation bundle?

An IP litigation bundle must comply with CPR Part 63 and Practice Direction 63. For patent cases, include the patent specification, Product and Process Description, Particulars of Infringement or Objections, prior art, technical primer, witness statements, and expert reports. For trade mark and copyright cases, include the registered rights, comparison evidence, and infringement analysis. BundleCreator formats your bundle with the correct sections and indexing for whichever IP court you are appearing in.

Create Your IP BundleSee How It Works

7-day free trial· No credit card required

CPR Part 63 Compliant
PPD Formatting Built In
Patents Court & IPEC

Your IP Dispute Journey

Select your case stage

Each stop is a step in the journey. Larger ringed stops are hearings where you build a court bundle; smaller stops are forms, process steps, or court outcomes. Click any stop to see what it involves.

Claimant Route(Claim Side)
Both parties — shared steps(You both do these)
Defendant Route(Defence Side)
Interim Applications(Runs Alongside)
After Trial(Post-Trial)
M= Mediation required
= Optional (does not always apply)
= Preparation or submission (no hearing)
iClaimant RouteClaim SideLBAClaim IssuedPOCN161Delivery UpInquiryIPEC / Patents Court / C…If liability established and quantum disputedreasonable response⚠ 14 d service⚠ 14 d AoSiBoth parties — shared stepsYou both do theseMADRCMCIPEC / Patents Court / C…Witness StmtsExpertsIf neededPTRIf neededDisclosureIf neededTrialIPEC / Patents Court / C…typ. 12–18 moiDefendant RouteDefence SideC&D ResponsePre-actionAoSIPEC / Patents CourtDefence + POOIPEC / Patents CourtPPDPatents CourtIf neededPrior ArtPatents CourtIf neededExpert (Def)IPEC / Patents CourtIf neededTrial (Def)IPEC / Patents CourtiInterim ApplicationsRuns AlongsideInjunctionHigh Court / IPECIf interim relief neededContemptiAfter TrialPost-TrialAppealCourt of AppealIf permission to appeal granted
Lines:Claimant RouteBoth parties — shared stepsDefendant RouteInterim ApplicationsAfter Trial
Stops:Bundle hearing — a court bundle is built hereProcess step — no bundle, just a procedural milestoneOptional step — dashed: not always applicable (e.g. only if needed or agreed)Form-filing endpoint — apply on a court form (warrant or enforcement)
Reading:Blog Insight — purple book icons link to a related article (opens in a new tab)
Timing:statutory — miss this and loserequired noticetypical wait
Laws:This journey summarises the procedure under Patents Act 1977 (as amended by IP (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 — s.70A), Trade Marks Act 1994 (as amended by IP (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 — s.21A), Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, Registered Designs Act 1949 (as amended by IP (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 — s.26), Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017, Civil Procedure Rules Part 63 + PD 63 (intellectual property claims; IPEC Small Claims Track in PD 63 Section IV), CPR 63.17A (IPEC financial-remedy cap £500,000); CPR 63.24 (IPEC specific disclosure regime), CPR PD 46 (moved from PD 45 on 1 October 2022) (IPEC costs cap £60,000 liability / £30,000 quantum, plus per-stage caps, in force 1 October 2022), Practice Direction 57AD (Disclosure in the Business and Property Courts — permanent regime since 1 October 2022; expressly excluded from IPEC by para 1.4(c)), Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols (general; no IP-specific protocol), Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Guide (revised November 2024), Patents Court Guide and Senior Courts Act 1981 s.37 (interim injunction power); s.72 (privilege against self-incrimination in IP cases). General information only — not legal advice.
© Steleo Publishing Ltd 2026. BundleCreator.co and the tube-map journey design are trade brands of Steleo Publishing Ltd.

⚠ THREATS WARNING — there is NO formal pre-action protocol specifically for IP claims. The general Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols applies, supported by the non-binding Code of Practice for Pre-Action Conduct in Intellectual Property Disputes. Groundless threats of infringement proceedings are actionable by the recipient under the Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 (which amended the Patents Act 1977 s.70A, Trade Marks Act 1994 s.21A, and the Registered Designs Act 1949 s.26). Get specialist drafting advice on any cease-and-desist letter — particularly for patents, trade marks and registered designs — before sending. A key strategic decision is whether to proceed in IPEC (the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) or the Patents Court / Chancery Division (now within the Business and Property Courts). IPEC offers a streamlined, cost-capped route — financial remedies capped under CPR 63.17A at £500,000, recoverable costs capped at £60,000 for a final determination on liability and £30,000 for a determination on quantum (raised from £50,000 / £25,000 with effect from 1 October 2022 by the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2022, SI 2022/783), with per-stage caps under PD 46 (moved from PD 45 on 1 October 2022), trials limited to 2 days plus reading, and statements of case limited to 25 pages. Ideal for SMEs and individuals. For IP claims valued at or below £10,000 (excluding patents, plant variety rights, registered designs, and semi-conductor topography rights) the IPEC Small Claims Track applies under PD 63 Section IV — informal procedure, no recoverable costs save for fixed costs and disbursements. The Patents Court and Chancery Division provide full procedure with no damages cap, complex technical evidence, and multi-day trials — appropriate for high-value or technically complex disputes. Before the CMC, parties exchange statements of case (particulars of claim, defence, and reply). In patent cases, these include product/process descriptions (PPDs). Counterclaims for invalidity are common. In IPEC, statements are limited to 25 pages. Between the CMC and trial, the court directs disclosure (IPEC operates under the specific disclosure regime in CPR 63.24 — orders only on application; the disclosure pilot PD 57AD is expressly excluded from IPEC by PD 57AD para 1.4(c)). Disclosure in the Patents Court / Business and Property Courts is governed by PD 57AD (permanent regime since 1 October 2022). Expert evidence on technical matters (patent validity and infringement), market surveys (trade mark confusion), or valuation (damages) is directed at the CMC. Bifurcation of liability and quantum is the default in IPEC (IPEC Guide para 7.1); in the Patents Court / Chancery Division it is an option decided at the CMC, not the default.

Important: This journey map shows the typical stages of the relevant court or tribunal proceedings. It is general information, not legal advice. Every case is different. For advice about your specific situation, consult a solicitor or instruct a barrister directly.

The law, court fees and time limits can change. We work hard to keep this map accurate, but it may contain errors or become out of date, so please check anything important against the official source — for example legislation.gov.uk or GOV.UK. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Steleo Publishing Limited does not accept liability for any loss arising from reliance on this map. Each stop represents a stage where a separate bundle may be required; BundleCreator handles the formatting — it does not replace professional legal advice.

Share this journey map

Share the whole journey — title, map, key and laws — as a single image.

WhatsAppLinkedInTwitter/XFacebook

Quick Answer

For IP litigation in England and Wales, your bundle must be organised according to CPR Part 63 and the relevant Practice Direction. Patents Court bundles typically include pleadings and orders, patent documents, Product and Process Descriptions, prior art, a technical primer, witness evidence, expert reports, and commercial evidence. IPEC bundles follow a streamlined format with limited disclosure and costs-capped procedures. Trade mark bundles require registration details, mark comparison evidence, and goods and services analysis. Copyright bundles need the original works, alleged copies, and evidence of access and substantial copying. BundleCreator is online court bundle software that provides structured templates for each IP right type with automatic indexing, page numbering, and hyperlinked navigation.

Last reviewed: 25 April 2026 by Stevie Hayes

Intellectual Property Court Bundle UK: In Brief

An intellectual property court bundle is filed at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC, part of the Business and Property Courts) or the Patents Court for trade mark, copyright, registered design, passing off, and patent disputes. Proceedings run under CPR Part 63 and Practice Direction 63. IPEC's small claims track handles low-value disputes up to £10,000; the multi-track handles claims up to £500,000 with capped costs.

Key rules
CPR Part 63 (intellectual property claims), Practice Direction 63
Key statutes
Trade Marks Act 1994, Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, Patents Act 1977, Registered Designs Act 1949
IPEC small claims cap
£10,000 (CPR 63.27); IPEC multi-track cap £500,000
Jurisdiction
IPEC small claims track, IPEC multi-track, Patents Court (KBD), Court of Appeal (Civil Division) for appeals
Bundle size
Trial bundles under CPR PD 39A; specimen documents and product samples often substantial; up to 1,000 pages supported with separate exhibits annex

Official guidance: CPR Part 63 — justice.gov.uk

UK intellectual property litigation key facts, 2026

Primary UK references on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs, and IP procedure.

StatValueSource
IP procedure rulesCPR Part 63 + IP Practice DirectionCivil Procedure Rules Part 63
Patents — governing statutePatents Act 1977 (as amended)Patents Act 1977
Trade marks — governing statuteTrade Marks Act 1994Trade Marks Act 1994
Copyright + designs — governing statuteCopyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988CDPA 1988
IPEC small claims trackClaims up to £10,000; £270 issue fee; capped costsCPR Part 63 + IPEC Guide
IPEC multi-track costs capStage costs capped (total typically £50,000)CPR 45 Section IV
Passing off — classic trinityGoodwill + misrepresentation + damageReckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] UKHL 12
5,000+

IP disputes per year

IPEC and the Patents Court handle over 5,000 intellectual property disputes annually.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, 2024

£500,000

IPEC damages cap

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court imposes a £500,000 cap on damages (or account of profits) for claims determined in IPEC.

Source: Civil Procedure Rules, Part 63 and Practice Direction 63

£50,000

IPEC costs cap

Recoverable costs in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court are capped at £50,000 for liability and a separate cap applies for quantum.

Source: Civil Procedure Rules, Rule 45.30 to 45.32

Built for IP Practitioners

Every feature designed for Patents Court, IPEC, and Chancery Division proceedings

CPR Part 63 Compliant

Bundles formatted to comply with CPR Part 63 and Practice Direction 63 requirements for IP proceedings in all specialist courts.

Product & Process Descriptions

Structured PPD sections with integer-by-integer claim correspondence, technical drawings, and photographs as required by PD63 para 6.1.

Prior Art Organisation

Dedicated sections for cited prior art documents with date evidence, translations, and cross-references to validity grounds.

Expert Evidence Sections

Separate tabs for claimant and defendant expert reports, joint statements, and experiments protocols with proper sequential numbering.

Claim Charts & Comparisons

Support for patent claim charts, trade mark comparison evidence, and copyright work-to-copy analysis within the bundle structure.

Technical Primer Section

Dedicated section for agreed technical background, glossaries, and diagrams as ordered by the Patents Court or IPEC.

Understanding IP Litigation Bundles

Key concepts for preparing bundles across patent, trade mark, copyright, and design disputes

IP Litigation Forums in England and Wales

Intellectual property disputes in England and Wales are heard in specialist courts within the Business and Property Courts. The correct forum depends on the complexity and value of the claim, and each has distinct procedural requirements for trial bundles.

The Patents Court hears complex patent infringement and validity disputes, often involving multi-week trials with extensive technical expert evidence. The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) provides a streamlined, costs-capped alternative for lower-value IP claims across all rights. The general Chancery Division handles complex trade mark, copyright, and confidential information cases.

IPEC: Streamlined IP Disputes

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court offers a costs-capped regime with a damages cap of GBP 500,000 and costs cap of GBP 50,000 (GBP 25,000 per stage). It hears all categories of IP dispute including patents, trade marks, copyright, designs, and passing off.

  • Damages cap: GBP 500,000 per claim
  • Costs cap: GBP 50,000 total (GBP 25,000 per stage)
  • Small Claims Track for claims up to GBP 10,000
  • Limited disclosure (specific disclosure only)
  • Single joint expert encouraged
  • Trials typically 2-3 days

Patents Court: Complex Patent Disputes

The Patents Court within the Chancery Division handles high-value and technically complex patent litigation. Proceedings follow CPR Part 63 and Practice Direction 63, with specialist requirements including Product and Process Descriptions, experiments notices, and technical primers.

  • Product and Process Descriptions (PPDs) required under PD63 para 6.1
  • Experiments notice and protocol for experimental evidence
  • Technical primers ordered where the court requires background
  • Sequential expert reports standard practice
  • Claim construction following Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48
  • Trials typically 1-2 weeks with live expert cross-examination

Trade Marks, Copyright, and Design Rights

Trade mark infringement claims under the Trade Marks Act 1994 require careful analysis of mark similarity, goods and services comparison, and likelihood of confusion. Copyright disputes under the CDPA 1988 involve questions of subsistence, ownership, and whether a substantial part has been copied. Design right claims engage both registered designs (Registered Designs Act 1949) and unregistered design right (CDPA 1988, Part III).

Each right type demands specific evidence in the trial bundle: mark comparison charts for trade marks, the copyright works and alleged copies for copyright, and informed user analysis for registered designs.

IP Dispute Templates

Choose the template that matches your IP right type and forum

Patent Infringement (Patents Court)

Full trial bundle with PPD, claim charts, prior art, and sequential expert reports for Patents Act 1977 s.60 claims.

Patent Infringement (IPEC)

Streamlined patent bundle within IPEC page and costs limits. Single joint expert format with concise PPD.

Trade Mark Infringement

Sections 10(1)-(3) TMA 1994 claims with mark comparison, goods and services analysis, and reputation evidence.

Copyright Infringement

CDPA 1988 claims with original work, alleged copies, access evidence, and substantial part analysis sections.

Interim Injunction (IP)

American Cyanamid application bundle with draft order, evidence of irreparable harm, and balance of convenience.

Confidential Information & Trade Secrets

Springboard injunction and trade secrets claims under the Trade Secrets Regulations 2018 with Coco v Clark analysis.

View All IP Templates

Manual Bundling vs IP Litigation Bundle Creator

See how BundleCreator streamlines intellectual property bundle preparation for the Patents Court and IPEC

FeatureManual BundlingBundleCreator
PD27A format checks
Automatic pagination
Index generation
Time to prepare bundle
4-8 hours
30-60 mins
PDF compression
Secure document storage
Template guidance
Error reduction
IPEC/Patents Court compliance
Automatic consecutive pagination
Exhibit labelling
Prior art evidence indexing
Technical document formatting
Time to prepare
4+ hours
Under 30 mins
Court filing format (text-based, embedded fonts)
Claim chart organisation
Start Free Trial

Free tools for your case

Picked for IPEC, Patents Court and IP litigation bundle preparation.

Free

Court Fee Calculator

Live fees from the GOV.UK EX50 schedule for every claim type.

Open tool
Free

Bundle Checklist Generator

Find every document you need for your specific hearing type.

Open tool
Free

Find Your Court

Postcode → nearest UK courts and tribunals, sorted by distance.

Open tool
See all twelve free legal tools →

Guides & Articles

IPEC Small Claims Track: How to Prepare Your IP Dispute Bundle

Guide to preparing bundles for the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track. Covers the £10,000 limit, simplified procedure, evidence requirements, and costs protection.

12 min read

Trade Mark Infringement Bundle: Evidence and Court Requirements

How to prepare a court bundle for trade mark infringement proceedings. Covers registered and unregistered marks, evidence of use, likelihood of confusion, and IPEC vs High Court procedures.

13 min read

Copyright Infringement Claim: Preparing Your Evidence Bundle

Guide to preparing a court bundle for copyright infringement claims. Covers proving ownership, evidence of copying, substantial part test, fair dealing defences, and IPEC procedures.

12 min read

Passing Off Claims: The Classic Trinity and Evidence Requirements

How to prepare evidence for a passing off claim. Covers the Jif Lemon classic trinity (goodwill, misrepresentation, damage), evidence of reputation, and court bundle preparation.

11 min read

Design Right Infringement: UK Registered and Unregistered Design Claims

Guide to design right infringement claims in the UK. Covers registered designs, unregistered design rights, community designs, evidence requirements, and IPEC bundle preparation.

12 min read

See it in action

A short walkthrough — what BundleCreator looks like inside, before you sign up.

Thumbnail: Creating Your First Bundle
1:39

Walkthrough

Creating Your First Bundle

From the dashboard to a court-ready bundle in under two minutes — pick your area, pick your hearing type, and BundleCreator pre-loads the templates the matter typically needs.

Watch the walkthrough→

IP litigation — technical and benefits from expert eyes

IPEC is more accessible than the Patents Court, but IP turns on technical evidence. BC presents your case; the strategy stays with your legal representative.

Thumbnail: When to Stop and Get Legal Advice
2:44

Knowing the Boundary

When to Stop and Get Legal Advice

IP cases turn on technical evidence — claim construction, prior art, the test for trade mark confusion, secondary evidence in copyright. IPEC's £50k damages cap makes it more accessible, but a chartered patent or trade mark attorney can change outcomes. BundleCreator handles the bundle; the substantive advice stays with your legal representative.

Watch — When to Get Legal Advice→

IP Litigation Bundle FAQs

Common questions about preparing bundles for intellectual property proceedings

BundleCreator's Intellectual Property template produces an IPEC-aligned bundle: pleadings (claim form, particulars of claim, defence, reply), the Case Management Conference order, witness statements, expert evidence (CPR Part 35), trial exhibits, and authorities. Output is paginated continuously, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index, and bookmarked — ready for the IPEC's electronic filing system. The IPEC small claims track (claims under £10,000) and multi-track (£10,000-£500,000) are both supported.

Patent infringement trials need: the patent specification with claims, the alleged infringing product/process specification, prior art bundle (often substantial), expert reports on infringement (claim construction, person skilled in the art) and validity (novelty, inventive step), Notice of Experiments where relevant, and authorities. BundleCreator's IP template structures these for the Patents Court (High Court) or IPEC with pagination, OCR, hyperlinked index from claim chart entries to evidence, and section bookmarks per claim.

A claim chart maps each patent claim element to the alleged infringing feature (or, in validity, to the prior art). BundleCreator's IP template includes a claim chart slot at the front of the bundle with hyperlinks from each claim element to the supporting evidence — expert report paragraphs, product specifications, prior art passages. The format trial counsel use at the Rolls Building Patents Court for streamlined claim-by-claim trial argument.

Passing off requires evidence of goodwill (the claimant's reputation in the relevant mark/get-up), misrepresentation by the defendant, and damage. BundleCreator's IP template orders the bundle: pleadings, witness statements on goodwill (sales figures, marketing spend, customer perceptions), survey evidence where commissioned, defendant's product/branding, expert evidence on consumer confusion, and authorities. Paginated, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index for IPEC or the Chancery Division.

UK registered design rights (Registered Designs Act 1949) and unregistered design rights (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Part III) infringement actions in the IPEC need: the registered design certificate or design documents, the alleged infringing article, side-by-side comparison evidence, witness statements on the design corpus and informed user, expert evidence on overall impression, and authorities. BundleCreator's IP template orders these for IPEC's streamlined procedure.

UKIPO opposition hearings under the Trade Marks Act 1994 typically need: the trade mark application (Form TM3), the notice of opposition (Form TM7) and counter-statement (Form TM8), the parties' statements of grounds, witness statements with exhibits, evidence on relative grounds (similarity of marks, similarity of goods/services, average consumer), evidence on absolute grounds where pleaded, and authorities. BundleCreator's IP template supports the UKIPO's electronic filing system with paginated, OCR'd, bookmarked output.

BundleCreator runs on Google Cloud's London region (europe-west2) — primary storage, backups, and processing all in the UK. AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit. Confidential information, trade secrets, and breach-of-confidence evidence stay within UK borders, removing UK GDPR Article 44 transfer concerns. Particularly relevant for confidentiality club arrangements where designated lawyers and experts review evidence under restricted-access undertakings.

Breach-of-confidence trials (for example, misuse of trade secrets, breach of NDAs, employee-departure disputes) typically have a confidentiality club arrangement under which only designated lawyers and experts see the confidential material. BundleCreator's IP template supports a redacted main bundle plus a separate confidentiality club bundle, both paginated, OCR'd, and bookmarked. Output formats align with the Chancery Division and IPEC requirements for trade-secret cases.

BundleCreator's Essential tier is £19.99 a month with no per-bundle fee — works for sole IP solicitors running IPEC small-claims and multi-track work. The Pro tier (£39.99) handles 40 bundles a month for high-street IP practices. Designed to produce IPEC, Patents Court, and UKIPO opposition bundles with continuous pagination, OCR, hyperlinked index, and section bookmarks. No per-seat minimums.

Still have questions? Contact our team

Ready to Create Your IP Litigation Bundle?

Join IP practitioners who trust BundleCreator for court-ready bundles.

Start Free Trial

7-day free trial — no credit card required

7-day free trial
No charge until trial ends
Cancel anytime

Embed This Journey Map

Add this interactive map to your website, blog, or resource page. Free to use — just copy the code below.

HTML
<iframe
  src="https://bundlecreator.co/embed/intellectual-property"
  width="100%"
  height="700"
  style="border: none; border-radius: 12px; box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);"
  title="Intellectual Property Disputes Journey Map - BundleCreator"
  loading="lazy"
  allow="clipboard-write"
></iframe>

Works on any website. No account required. Includes “Powered by BundleCreator” branding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best bundle template for the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC)?

BundleCreator's Intellectual Property template produces an IPEC-aligned bundle: pleadings (claim form, particulars of claim, defence, reply), the Case Management Conference order, witness statements, expert evidence (CPR Part 35), trial exhibits, and authorities. Output is paginated continuously, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index, and bookmarked — ready for the IPEC's electronic filing system. The IPEC small claims track (claims under £10,000) and multi-track (£10,000-£500,000) are both supported.

How do I prepare a patent infringement trial bundle with prior art?

Patent infringement trials need: the patent specification with claims, the alleged infringing product/process specification, prior art bundle (often substantial), expert reports on infringement (claim construction, person skilled in the art) and validity (novelty, inventive step), Notice of Experiments where relevant, and authorities. BundleCreator's IP template structures these for the Patents Court (High Court) or IPEC with pagination, OCR, hyperlinked index from claim chart entries to evidence, and section bookmarks per claim.

How do I prepare a claim chart bundle template for the Patents Court?

A claim chart maps each patent claim element to the alleged infringing feature (or, in validity, to the prior art). BundleCreator's IP template includes a claim chart slot at the front of the bundle with hyperlinks from each claim element to the supporting evidence — expert report paragraphs, product specifications, prior art passages. The format trial counsel use at the Rolls Building Patents Court for streamlined claim-by-claim trial argument.

How do I prepare a passing off claim bundle with goodwill evidence?

Passing off requires evidence of goodwill (the claimant's reputation in the relevant mark/get-up), misrepresentation by the defendant, and damage. BundleCreator's IP template orders the bundle: pleadings, witness statements on goodwill (sales figures, marketing spend, customer perceptions), survey evidence where commissioned, defendant's product/branding, expert evidence on consumer confusion, and authorities. Paginated, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index for IPEC or the Chancery Division.

How do I prepare a design rights infringement IPEC bundle?

UK registered design rights (Registered Designs Act 1949) and unregistered design rights (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Part III) infringement actions in the IPEC need: the registered design certificate or design documents, the alleged infringing article, side-by-side comparison evidence, witness statements on the design corpus and informed user, expert evidence on overall impression, and authorities. BundleCreator's IP template orders these for IPEC's streamlined procedure.

How do I prepare a trade mark opposition bundle for UKIPO hearing?

UKIPO opposition hearings under the Trade Marks Act 1994 typically need: the trade mark application (Form TM3), the notice of opposition (Form TM7) and counter-statement (Form TM8), the parties' statements of grounds, witness statements with exhibits, evidence on relative grounds (similarity of marks, similarity of goods/services, average consumer), evidence on absolute grounds where pleaded, and authorities. BundleCreator's IP template supports the UKIPO's electronic filing system with paginated, OCR'd, bookmarked output.

Is there a UK-hosted IP bundling tool for confidential information and trade secrets?

BundleCreator runs on Google Cloud's London region (europe-west2) — primary storage, backups, and processing all in the UK. AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit. Confidential information, trade secrets, and breach-of-confidence evidence stay within UK borders, removing UK GDPR Article 44 transfer concerns. Particularly relevant for confidentiality club arrangements where designated lawyers and experts review evidence under restricted-access undertakings.

How do I prepare a confidential information / breach-of-confidence trial bundle?

Breach-of-confidence trials (for example, misuse of trade secrets, breach of NDAs, employee-departure disputes) typically have a confidentiality club arrangement under which only designated lawyers and experts see the confidential material. BundleCreator's IP template supports a redacted main bundle plus a separate confidentiality club bundle, both paginated, OCR'd, and bookmarked. Output formats align with the Chancery Division and IPEC requirements for trade-secret cases.

Is there a cheap bundle tool for sole IP solicitors?

BundleCreator's Essential tier is £19.99 a month with no per-bundle fee — works for sole IP solicitors running IPEC small-claims and multi-track work. The Pro tier (£39.99) handles 40 bundles a month for high-street IP practices. Designed to produce IPEC, Patents Court, and UKIPO opposition bundles with continuous pagination, OCR, hyperlinked index, and section bookmarks. No per-seat minimums.

Built by Stevie Hayes, a Governance, Risk and Compliance specialist who spent five years in the UK Family Court system. Published October 2025 · Last updated 26 April 2026.

support@bundlecreator.co · ICO Registration ZB969283 · UK GDPR

Related Resources