What is Section 25 Factors?

Understanding the Section 25 Matrimonial Causes Act factors that courts use to divide assets in divorce. Each factor explained.

Section 25 Factors: How Courts Divide Assets in Divorce

Last updated: January 2026

Quick Answer

Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 is the statutory checklist courts must apply when dividing assets on divorce. It includes: children's welfare (paramount), income and resources, financial needs, standard of living, age and marriage duration, disabilities, contributions, and conduct (rarely relevant). According to case law including White v White [2000] and Miller v Miller [2006], the guiding principles are sharing (typically 50/50 for matrimonial assets) and needs (meeting both parties' reasonable requirements).

The Section 25 Framework

"The court shall in particular have regard to all the circumstances of the case, first consideration being given to the welfare while a minor of any child of the family who has not attained the age of eighteen." — Section 25, Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

The Complete Section 25 Checklist

Factor	Section Reference
Children's welfare	First consideration for under-18s
Income, earning capacity, resources	§25(2)(a)
Financial needs, obligations, responsibilities	§25(2)(b)
Standard of living during marriage	§25(2)(c)
Age and duration of marriage	§25(2)(d)
Physical or mental disability	§25(2)(e)
Contributions to family welfare	§25(2)(f)
Conduct	§25(2)(g) – if inequitable to disregard
Loss of benefits	§25(2)(h) – primarily pension rights

Factor 1: Children's Welfare

This comes first for good reason. Where there are children under 18, their welfare takes priority.

Impact	Effect on Settlement
Housing needs	Primary carer often needs family home or equivalent
Stability	Continuity of schooling and community
Financial support	Child maintenance considerations
Both parents' involvement	Arrangements enabling ongoing relationships

"The primary carer's housing needs often shape the entire settlement. Children's welfare doesn't override everything, but decisions must not disadvantage them." — Judicial guidance

Factor 2: Income, Earning Capacity and Resources

What Courts Consider

Element	Examples
Current income	Employment, self-employment, investments, benefits
Earning capacity	What they could reasonably earn, not just current earnings
Resources now	Savings, investments, property, pensions
Future resources	Expected inheritances, bonuses, claims pending

Earning Capacity Expectations

Situation	Court Approach
Qualified professional working part-time	May expect increased hours post-divorce
Career break for children	Realistic time allowed to return to work
Never worked during marriage	Training needs and realistic earning potential assessed
Close to retirement	Limited expectations of increased earnings

Factor 3: Financial Needs, Obligations and Responsibilities

"The word 'needs' does most of the work in most cases. Where assets are limited, meeting needs often consumes everything available." — Case law principle

Needs Assessment

Category	What's Considered
Housing requirements	Home appropriate to circumstances
Income needs	Living expenses, standard of living
Children's needs	School fees, activities, medical needs
Debt obligations	Mortgage payments, loans, credit
Previous relationship obligations	Maintenance from earlier marriages

Factor 4: Standard of Living

The standard of living during the marriage sets a benchmark:

Marriage Type	Post-Divorce Expectation
Modest marriage	Neither expects lavish lifestyle
Comfortable marriage	Both expect reasonable comfort
Wealthy marriage	Both expect substantial provision
Short marriage	Standard less determinative

Courts acknowledge that two households cost more than one—neither party typically maintains the exact marital standard.

Factor 5: Age and Duration of Marriage

Age Impact

Factor	Effect
Earning years remaining	Younger parties can rebuild
Housing needs	May change with age
Retirement proximity	Pension importance increases
Health considerations	Often correlate with age

Duration Impact

Marriage Length	Typical Approach
Very short (0-3 years), no children	Often return to pre-marital positions
Medium (3-10 years)	Increasing sharing of assets
Long (10+ years)	Full sharing principle typically applies

Duration is calculated from marriage to separation, not to divorce proceedings.

Factor 6: Physical or Mental Disability

Consideration	Impact
Work capacity	Reduced earnings potential
Care needs	Additional costs
Accommodation requirements	Adapted housing may be needed
Future prognosis	Worsening conditions factored in

Factor 7: Contributions to Family Welfare

Equal Treatment Principle

Contribution Type	Treatment
Financial contributions	Earnings, inherited wealth brought in
Non-financial contributions	Homemaking, childcare, supporting spouse's career

"A landmark principle of English family law: the breadwinner's and homemaker's contributions are treated equally." — White v White [2000] UKHL 54

This doesn't mean 50/50 in every case, but stay-at-home parents aren't disadvantaged for "not working."

Factor 8: Conduct

This is where expectations often collide with reality.

What Conduct Might Count

Conduct	Why It Might Matter
Deliberate asset dissipation	Spending to defeat spouse's claim
Hiding assets	False or incomplete disclosure
Violence causing lasting harm	Affecting ability to work
Financial misconduct	Gambling away family assets

What Conduct Doesn't Count

Conduct	Why It's Irrelevant
Adultery	Not relevant to financial division
Unreasonable behaviour	In ordinary sense
Being difficult	Personality issues
Starting new relationship	Post-separation or earlier

"Courts aren't moral arbiters of marriages. The question is fair financial division, not punishment for wrongdoing." — Judicial guidance

Conduct only matters where it would be "inequitable to disregard"—truly exceptional cases.

Factor 9: Loss of Benefits

Benefit	How Courts Address
Pension rights	Pension sharing orders or offsetting
Life insurance	Compensation or replacement provision
Inheritance expectations	May be factored into settlement

Key Principles from Case Law

Principle	Application
Starting point	Equality for matrimonial assets
Non-matrimonial assets	May be treated differently
No discrimination	Between breadwinner and homemaker
Cross-check	Does outcome pass the fairness test?

Needs (Miller v Miller [2006])

Principle	Application
Primary focus	Meeting both parties' reasonable needs
Generous interpretation	Needs assessed generously in wealthy cases
Limited assets	Needs consume available resources
Surplus assets	Sharing principles apply to excess

Compensation (McFarlane v McFarlane [2006])

Principle	When Applied
Relationship-generated disadvantage	Career sacrificed for family
Not reflected in sharing	When needs/sharing don't compensate
Rarely awarded separately	Usually subsumed in overall settlement

Practical Application

Big Money Cases

Feature	Approach
Assets exceed needs	Focus shifts to sharing
Matrimonial assets	Typically divided equally
Non-matrimonial assets	Pre-marital wealth, inheritances may be excluded
Contributions	May justify departure from equality

Needs-Based Cases

Feature	Approach
Limited assets	Sharing less relevant
Focus on needs	Meeting needs fairly
Children's welfare	Drives many decisions
Housing priority	Primary carer's home often protected
Maintenance	May be needed if capital inadequate

Short Marriage, No Children

Feature	Approach
Return to pre-marital positions	Often the starting point
Pre-marital assets	May be returned
Marriage-generated assets	Divided fairly
"I brought more in"	Carries more weight than in long marriages

Preparing Your Case

What to Document

Factor	Evidence Needed
Income and resources	Form E, payslips, statements
Earning capacity	Qualifications, work history
Needs	Housing quotes, budget, children's needs
Contributions	Career sacrifices, childcare, homemaking
Standard of living	Evidence of marital lifestyle

Position Statement Approach

Reference Section 25 factors explicitly:

"Applying Section 25, the applicant's needs for housing as primary carer of two young children (§25(1)), her limited earning capacity following career sacrifices during a 15-year marriage (§25(a) and (f)), and the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage (§25(c)) support award of the former matrimonial home..."

Preparing Your Section 25 Evidence: Building your case around Section 25 factors requires organised documentation. BundleCreator.co helps you structure evidence by category—needs, contributions, standard of living—with proper pagination and indexing.

Common Misunderstandings

Myth	Reality
"Fault matters"	With rare exceptions, it doesn't
"50/50 always"	Equality is a starting point, not automatic
"Non-working spouses get less"	Homemaker's contribution equals breadwinner's
"Assets stay with owner"	Court can transfer regardless of title
"Future income is guaranteed"	Capacity assessed, but can't be forced

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the Section 25 factors?

The statutory checklist in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that courts must consider when dividing assets: children's welfare, income and resources, financial needs, standard of living, age and marriage duration, disabilities, contributions, conduct, and loss of benefits.

Study each factor – understand how it applies to your case
Gather evidence – for each factor where you're strong
Complete Form E thoroughly – comprehensive financial disclosure
Document contributions – especially non-financial ones
Assess needs realistically – housing, income, children
Prepare asset schedule – what exists and proposed division
Draft position statement – referencing Section 25 explicitly
Organise your bundle – use BundleCreator.co for court compliance

This guide provides general information about Section 25 factors in England and Wales. It is not legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, consult a qualified family solicitor.

Sources:

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, Section 25
White v White [2000] UKHL 54
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
Family Procedure Rules
Resolution Financial Remedy Guidance

Ready to Create Your Bundle?

Ready to create your Financial Remedy Bundle?

Court Fee Calculator

Bundle Checklist Generator

PD27A Compliance Checklist

Watch the short walkthrough

Getting Started with BundleCreator

Creating Your First Bundle

Using Templates Effectively

About the Author

Stevie Hayes