PD27A Pagination & Indexing: What Courts Actually Require in 2026
Get the exact PD27A pagination, indexing, and e-bundle requirements for family court in 2026. Includes page numbering rules, index format, 350-page limit, and the 7 most common mistakes that lead to bundle rejection.
Quick Answer
Get the exact PD27A pagination, indexing, and e-bundle requirements for family court in 2026. Includes page numbering rules, index format, 350-page limit, and the 7 most common mistakes that lead to bundle rejection.
PD27A Pagination and Indexing Requirements 2026
Last updated: 24 April 2026
Quick answer
Practice Direction 27A splits pagination by proceedings type. Non-financial-remedy Family proceedings (children, FLA, adoption) use Bates numbering — letters per section, numbers restarting in each: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2 (Ch 7.2). Financial remedy proceedings use Arabic numbering consecutive through the whole bundle, matched to PDF page labels (Ch 6.2). Both require a hyperlinked index, OCR, bookmarks, and Arial or Times New Roman at 12pt minimum.
Understanding Practice Direction 27A
Practice Direction 27A governs court bundles in family proceedings. The current version came into force on 2 March 2026 and was amended on 24 March 2026 by FPR Practice Direction Update No 1 of 2026 (the 24 March amendment was clarifying only — it did not change the pagination rules). The PD applies to all hearings in the Family Division of the High Court and the family court across England and Wales, and covers both e-bundles (the default) and paper bundles.
The PD itself defines Bates numbering at paragraph 1.2:
"Bates numbering" is a numbering system where each section of a bundle is denoted by a letter, with each page in that section also being numbered, so that the first section begins at page A1, then page A2 and so on, and the second section begins at page B1, then page B2 and so on, through each section.
That is the entire rule. Each new section restarts at 1 with its own letter prefix.
2026 pagination requirements
Chapter 6 — financial remedy proceedings: Arabic numbering
For financial remedy (divorce finances, financial relief under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s. 25, Sch 1 CA 1989 applications, etc.), PD27A Ch 6.2 requires:
- Chronological arrangement within sections
- Arabic numbering, consecutive and individual, running through the whole bundle
- Index at the beginning
- E-bundle PDF numbering must match the pagination (this alignment is now mandatory — 11.2(c))
- Sections divided by numbered blank dividers
Output is simply 1, 2, 3 … 347. No section letter prefix. The practical strength of Arabic numbering for financial remedy bundles is that everyone in the hearing — advocate, opponent, judge — can refer to "page 212" with no ambiguity.
Chapter 7 — all other Family proceedings: Bates numbering
For all non-financial-remedy Family proceedings, PD27A Ch 7.2 requires:
- Chronological arrangement within sections
- Index at the beginning (unpaginated)
- Sections divided by numbered blank dividers
- Bates numbering pagination system (section letter + number, numbers restart at 1 in each new section)
The output across the standard sections (Ch 7.3) is:
| Section | Contents | Numbering |
|---|---|---|
| A | Preliminary documents and case management documents | A1, A2, A3, A4 … |
| B | Applications and orders (sealed or approved) | B1, B2, B3 … |
| C | Statements and affidavits (dated, no exhibits) | C1, C2, C3 … |
| D | Care plans (where applicable) | D1, D2 … |
| E | Experts' and other reports (including children's guardian reports) | E1, E2 … |
| F | Relevant medical records | F1, F2 … |
| G | Relevant police disclosure | G1, G2 … |
| H | Child's birth certificate or equivalent (public law Case Management Hearings) | H1 |
| I (etc.) | Other relevant documents by appropriate divisions | I1, I2 … |
Numbers never continue across sections. Section B opens at B1, not at the next number after the last document of section A. This is the point most commonly misunderstood, and getting it wrong exposes you to the Ch 3 non-compliance consequences (case removed from list, postponement, adverse costs, wasted costs).
Why Bates for children's cases and Arabic for financial remedy
Bates numbering permits incremental updating without renumbering every page downstream. Children's proceedings run over many hearings and months; documents are filed in waves. A bundle paginated 1 … 437 at first hearing would need re-pagination every time a new witness statement is added. Bates lets you just append C8, C9 to the statements section without disturbing the rest.
Financial remedy bundles are typically assembled in one hit for each hearing (First Appointment, FDR, Final), so the single-sequence simplicity of Arabic numerals works better there.
Subsequent hearings (7.16)
For non-financial-remedy bundles filed at later hearings in the same case:
- New documents are added to the end of the relevant section
- Bates numbering continues within that section only (e.g. if section C ended at C7 at first hearing and two new statements are filed, they become C8 and C9)
- Superseded documents are removed
- The rest of the bundle's numbering is undisturbed
Page-number placement
| Aspect | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Position | Bottom centre or bottom right |
| Consistency | Same position on every page |
| Font size | Minimum 12 point (PD27A Ch 11.2(k), 12.2) |
| Format | {letter}{number} for Bates proceedings; Arabic numeral for financial remedy |
| Style | Plain; do not hand-number |
Dealing with exhibits
The PD27A per-document page cap for witness statements is 25 pages exclusive of exhibits (Ch 8.1). Exhibits are paginated inside the main Bates or Arabic sequence — they do not get their own lettered sub-sequence unless the court specifically directs.
2026 indexing requirements
What the index must include
Para 11.2(d) for e-bundles requires:
- Each index entry added as a link in the indexed document
- All significant documents and sections bookmarked with short descriptions and page numbers
- Bundle searchable where possible
Index structure example (non-financial-remedy, Bates)
Here is a properly formatted index for a Child Arrangements Order bundle using Bates numbering:
| Item | Document | Date | Author | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Case Summary | 20 Jan 2026 | Applicant | A1–A2 |
| A2 | Applicant's Position Statement | 18 Jan 2026 | Applicant | A3–A5 |
| A3 | Respondent's Position Statement | 19 Jan 2026 | Respondent | A6–A8 |
| B1 | C100 Application Form | 1 Nov 2025 | Applicant | B1–B13 |
| B2 | C1A Supplementary Form | 1 Nov 2025 | Applicant | B14–B18 |
| B3 | Acknowledgement C7 | 20 Nov 2025 | Respondent | B19–B21 |
| B4 | Child Arrangements Order (2023) | 15 Mar 2023 | Court | B22–B24 |
| C1 | Applicant's Witness Statement | 15 Jan 2026 | Applicant | C1–C15 |
| D1 | Care Plan | 10 Dec 2025 | Local Authority | D1–D10 |
| E1 | CAFCASS Safeguarding Letter | 10 Dec 2025 | CAFCASS | E1–E4 |
Hyperlinked index (electronic bundles)
For e-bundles, Para 11.2(d) requires each significant document and section to be bookmarked with short descriptions and page numbers. Clicking an entry should navigate directly to that document within the PDF.
Technical requirements:
- Every entry clickable
- Links go to the exact page
- Links tested before submission
- Index appears as the first page(s) of the bundle
Electronic bundle specifications (PD27A Chapter 11)
Subject to case-specific court directions, every e-bundle must meet all of the following (Ch 11.2):
| (a) Format | PDF only | | (b) Page limit | Maximum 350 pages (A4 size); exceeding requires court permission | | (c) Page numbering | Computer-generated only; Arabic for Ch 6, Bates for Ch 7; PDF page labels match pagination for financial remedy | | (d) Indexing | Each index entry linked; significant documents and sections bookmarked; searchable where possible | | (e) OCR | All typed text pages OCR'd if not directly electronic | | (f) Orientation | Landscape pages appear landscape; no sideways or upside-down pages | | (g) Page view | Default 100% | | (j) Resolution | Not exceeding 300 dpi; electronically optimised | | (k) Spacing | Minimum 12 point, 1.5 or double line spacing, margins each side | | (l) Typeface | Arial or Times New Roman — the PD explicitly notes Arial as "generally more accessible to neurodiverse readers" |
Bundle page cap and document page caps
E-bundles are capped at 350 pages A4. Paper bundles are capped at 175 sheets / 350 sides. In addition, per-document caps apply (Ch 8.1):
| Document type | Page / sheet limit |
|---|---|
| Care plan | 10 |
| Case summary | 6 |
| Statement of issues | 2 |
| Chronology | 10 |
| List of essential reading | 1 |
| Witness statement or affidavit (exclusive of exhibits) | 25 |
| Expert's or other report (including max 4-page executive summary) | 40 |
Exceeding any cap requires the court to specifically direct otherwise, satisfied that such direction is necessary for just proceedings.
OCR
All pages must be searchable. Scanned documents must be OCR'd so that text can be selected, copied, and searched (Ctrl+F / Cmd+F). This is a change of emphasis from earlier PD27A versions where OCR was recommended; it is now required for typed text pages.
Bookmarks
Electronic bundles must include PDF bookmarks for navigation. Structure them to mirror the Bates sections (for non-financial-remedy) or the financial remedy section order (for Ch 6). Each significant document gets a bookmark with a short description and page number.
Document ordering
Non-financial-remedy (Ch 7.3)
Section order is fixed by the PD:
| Section | Contents |
|---|---|
| A | Preliminary documents and case management documents |
| B | Applications and orders (sealed or approved) |
| C | Statements and affidavits (dated, no exhibits) |
| D | Care plans (where applicable) |
| E | Experts' and other reports (including children's guardian reports) |
| F | Relevant medical records |
| G | Relevant police disclosure |
| H | Public law CMH: child's birth certificate or equivalent |
| I (etc.) | Other relevant documents by appropriate divisions |
Within each section, arrange documents chronologically.
Financial remedy (Ch 6.3)
| Section | Contents |
|---|---|
| (a) | Preliminary documents and case management documents |
| (b) | Applications and orders (sealed or approved) |
| (c) | Statements and affidavits (Forms E, questionnaire replies, parties' statements without exhibits) |
| (d) | Experts' and other reports |
| (e) | Other relevant documents |
All statements, affidavits, and reports must be signed and dated originals.
Common pagination and indexing errors
| Error | Problem | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Numbering continuously across sections in a non-financial-remedy bundle (A1, A2, B3, B4, C5) | Wrong format under PD27A Ch 7 — Bates restarts at 1 in each section | Restart at 1 in each section: A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, B3, C1 … |
| Using Bates (A1, A2, B1, B2) in a financial remedy bundle | Wrong format under PD27A Ch 6 — Arabic required | Use Arabic 1, 2, 3 … with PDF page labels matched |
| Mixing Bates and Arabic in one bundle | Internally inconsistent | Pick one based on proceedings type |
| Missing index entries | Documents unfindable | List every document, including exhibits |
| Wrong page numbers in index | Mismatch causes confusion | Generate index after pagination |
| Non-hyperlinked e-bundle index | Violates 11.2(d) | Use clickable, tested links |
| Illegible page numbers | Breach of 11.2(k) / 12.2 font requirements | Minimum 12 point, clear typeface |
| Missing bookmarks | Violates 11.2(d) | Add bookmarks for each section and significant document |
| Non-searchable PDF | Violates 11.2(e) OCR requirement | Apply OCR to all typed text pages |
Changes from the previous PD27A
PD27A was substantially revised on 2 March 2026. Key changes:
| Aspect | Previous Requirement | March 2026 Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Non-financial-remedy pagination | Arabic throughout, with sections "separately paginated" | Bates numbering (section letter + number, restart per section) |
| Financial remedy pagination | Arabic | Arabic (PDF page labels must now match) |
| Electronic submission | Optional alongside paper | Default (paper only in exceptional circumstances) |
| Filing deadline (bundle body) | 2 working days before | 5 working days before |
| Preliminary documents deadline | Not formally specified | 11am the working day before |
| Bundle contents agreement | Not specified | 7 working days before |
| E-bundle page cap | Not formally specified | 350 pages A4 maximum |
| Paper bundle cap | Broadly specified | 175 sheets / 350 sides maximum |
| Bookmarks | Recommended | Required for electronic bundles |
| Hyperlinked index | Optional | Required for electronic bundles |
| OCR | Recommended | Required for typed text pages |
| Font | Not specified | Arial or Times New Roman; Arial flagged as accessible |
| Authorities | Variable | Maximum 10 in composite authorities bundle |
| Per-document page caps | Guidance-level | Codified (witness statements 25pp, expert reports 40pp, etc.) |
| Previous hearing bundles | Often included by convention | Should not be included unless court-directed |
How BundleCreator helps you work within the rules
Implementing PD27A correctly every time is what matters. BundleCreator produces Bates-numbered bundles for non-financial-remedy proceedings by default (per-section restart matching PD27A Ch 7), and supports Arabic numbering for financial remedy bundles.
| Requirement | Manual Process | BundleCreator |
|---|---|---|
| Bates pagination | Edit PDF page by page | Automatic |
| Index creation | Type in Word, calculate pages | Auto-generated |
| Hyperlinks | Advanced PDF editing | Automatic |
| Bookmarks | Manual insertion | Automatic |
| OCR | Separate software | Built-in |
| Compression | Trial and error | Typically 20–70% reduction, content-dependent |
| Time | 2–4 hours | 10–15 minutes |
Checking your bundle for compliance
Non-financial-remedy pagination checklist
- Each section opens at
{letter}1(A1, B1, C1 …) - Within each section, numbers run consecutively (A1, A2, A3 …)
- Numbers do not continue across section boundaries
- Exhibits included in the main Bates sequence
- Numbers clearly legible at 12pt minimum
- No gaps or duplicates within any section
Financial remedy pagination checklist
- All pages numbered consecutively (1, 2, 3 …) throughout the bundle
- PDF page labels match the pagination
- Section dividers are present but do not reset the count
- Exhibits included in the main sequence
Index checklist
- Every document listed
- Document descriptions accurate
- Dates included
- Page references correct
- Index hyperlinked (electronic)
- Links tested and working
Electronic bundle checklist
- PDF only
- Under 350 pages A4 (or court-directed otherwise)
- Text searchable (OCR applied)
- Bookmarks present and navigating correctly
- Default view 100%, landscape pages correctly oriented
- File opens without errors
Frequently asked questions
Should I include the index page in the pagination?
Yes, generally. The index is typically page 1 (or pages 1–2 for longer bundles).
How do I handle documents with existing page numbers?
The original document's own page numbers can remain, but add the bundle's Bates or Arabic pagination as well. The bundle's page references take precedence.
What about landscape documents?
Under PD27A 11.2(f), landscape pages must appear landscape (readable left-to-right). Do not rotate them to portrait. Paginate them in the same position as portrait pages (typically bottom centre or bottom right when viewed in correct orientation).
Can I use Arabic numerals in a non-financial-remedy bundle?
No, unless the court specifically directs. PD27A Ch 7.2 requires Bates numbering. Arabic numerals are the required format for financial remedy proceedings only.
Do I need to include blank pages?
No. Remove blank pages before pagination. PD27A requires numbered blank dividers between sections, not blank pages within documents.
What if my bundle would exceed 350 pages?
Apply to the court for permission to exceed the cap. The application should identify the documents necessary for the hearing and explain why the full set is required. Courts expect reasoned requests, not blanket waivers.
Official resources
- Practice Direction 27A — Current official requirements
- Family Procedure Rules — Full procedural rules
- Preparing Court Bundles for Family Proceedings: Guide for Litigants in Person — Judiciary's LiP guide (2 March 2026)
Get compliant bundles automatically
Implementing PD27A correctly every time is what matters.
BundleCreator handles Bates (or Arabic, for financial remedy) pagination, indexing, bookmarking, OCR, and compression automatically. Upload your documents, arrange them in order, and generate a compliant bundle.
Start your 14-day trial at bundlecreator.co and create your first compliant bundle today.
Further reading
- How to Create a PD27A-Aligned Court Bundle — Complete compliance guide
- Best Electronic Court Bundle Software for Litigants in Person — Software comparison
- FHDRA Hearing: How to Prepare Your Bundle — First hearing preparation
- What Happens at a Fact-Finding Hearing? — Fact-finding bundle requirements
Free tools mentioned in this article
Watch the short walkthrough
Short tutorial videos showing the exact BundleCreator features mentioned in this article.

Core Concepts
Page Numbering Explained (And Why It Matters)
"Turn to page forty-two" — and everyone in the room needs to be on page forty-two. This explainer covers the two page-numbering styles courts use (continuous and section-restart), the rule that electronic bundles must be numbered by computer rather than by hand, and how BundleCreator re-flows every page number automatically when you move a document.

Core Concepts
The Bundle Index Explained
Every bundle starts with one page — not your strongest evidence, but an index. This short explainer covers what an index must do under the rules of England and Wales, why manually-produced bundles fall down when a document moves, and how BundleCreator regenerates the index automatically every time you add, reorder or upload.

Onboarding
Getting Started with BundleCreator
Your first thirty seconds in BundleCreator — the dashboard, the trial banner, the Create Bundle button top right, the area-of-law modal covering 24 areas of law plus a Pro-tips practice tile, and the editor with sections, document, toolbar, and the Sections / Continuous numbering toggle. Built for litigants in person and legal professionals across England and Wales.
About the Author
Stevie Hayes
Legal Technology Compliance Specialist & Founder
Former Head of Data Security at Holland & Barrett, a Governance, Risk and Compliance specialist, Stevie brings over 30 years of technology expertise—including delivery for Sky, Disney, and BT—to court bundle compliance. His five years navigating the UK Family Court, both with legal representation and as a litigant in person, revealed the gap between what courts require and what tools deliver.
Areas of Expertise:
ISO 27001 Information Security • Data Security & Compliance • Practice Direction 27A • UK Family Court Procedures