Section 8 Order Children Act: Welfare Checklist Explained
Understanding the Section 1(3) welfare checklist that courts use to make decisions about Section 8 orders including child arrangements orders. How to address each factor.
In Brief
Understanding the Section 1(3) welfare checklist that courts use to make decisions about Section 8 orders including child arrangements orders. How to address each factor.
Welfare Checklist Explained (Section 1 Children Act 1989)
Last updated: January 2026
Quick Answer
The welfare checklist is the legal framework courts use to make all decisions about children under Section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989. It contains seven mandatory factors that judges must consider: the child's wishes and feelings, physical/emotional/educational needs, the likely effect of change, age/sex/background/characteristics, any harm suffered or at risk, parental capability, and the range of powers available. According to GOV.UK statistics, over 28,000 private law cases each quarter are decided using this framework.
The Paramount Principle
Before the checklist itself, there's an overarching principle. Section 1(1) of the Children Act 1989 states:
"When a court determines any question with respect to the upbringing of a child... the child's welfare shall be the court's paramount consideration."
This means the child's welfare comes first. Not the parents' rights, not fairness between adults, not what seems most convenient. The child's welfare.
| Principle | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Paramount consideration | Child's welfare overrides all other factors |
| Not a balancing exercise | Welfare isn't weighed against parents' interests |
| Evidence-based | Decisions based on facts, not assumptions |
| Forward-looking | Focus on future welfare, not past grievances |
The Seven Factors of the Welfare Checklist
Section 1(3) Children Act 1989 sets out seven factors judges must consider:
| Factor | Summary |
|---|---|
| 1 | The ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child |
| 2 | Physical, emotional and educational needs |
| 3 | The likely effect of any change in circumstances |
| 4 | Age, sex, background and any relevant characteristics |
| 5 | Any harm the child has suffered or is at risk of suffering |
| 6 | How capable each parent is of meeting the child's needs |
| 7 | The range of powers available to the court |
Factor 1: The Child's Wishes and Feelings
Courts consider what children want, taking into account their age and understanding. This isn't about letting children decide—that responsibility stays with adults.
"The wishes and feelings of the child are to be considered having regard to their age and understanding. They are one factor among several, not determinative." — CAFCASS Guidance
How Weight Varies by Age
| Age Group | Weight Given to Wishes |
|---|---|
| Under 5 | Limited—cannot meaningfully express preferences |
| 5-7 | Considered but understood as potentially influenced |
| 8-12 | Increasing weight with maturity |
| 13-16 | Taken seriously, particularly if well-reasoned |
| 16+ | Significant weight; rarely ordered against wishes |
What This Means for Your Case
- Don't coach your children. Courts and CAFCASS are experienced at identifying coached children—it damages your credibility badly.
- Acknowledge children may say different things to different people.
- Explain if children's wishes conflict with their welfare (e.g., wanting to stay with a parent who sets no boundaries).
Factor 2: Physical, Emotional and Educational Needs
This covers the full spectrum of what children require for healthy development.
Needs Categories
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Physical | Safe housing, adequate food, healthcare, protection from harm |
| Emotional | Stability, love, attachment opportunities, age-appropriate boundaries |
| Educational | Schooling, learning support, extra-curricular activities, SEN provision |
What This Means for Your Case
Show the court how you meet these needs with specifics:
- What school activities do you support?
- How do you handle bedtime routines?
- What provisions have you made for children's space in your home?
- How do you support their emotional development?
If you believe the other parent falls short, be specific and evidence-based—concrete examples carry weight.
Factor 3: The Likely Effect of Any Change
Courts are cautious about disrupting children's lives. The status quo carries weight because stability matters.
Change Assessment
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| How long have current arrangements lasted? | Longer = more weight to status quo |
| How is the child doing under current arrangements? | Working arrangements favour continuation |
| What would change involve practically? | New school, area, routines add risk |
| How has the child coped with past changes? | Resilient vs. anxious about change |
| Is the proposed change permanent? | Temporary may be less disruptive |
What This Means for Your Case
If seeking significant change, address this directly:
- Why is change justified despite disruption?
- How will you manage the transition?
- What evidence shows change serves welfare?
If defending status quo, this factor works for you—but don't assume it's decisive.
Factor 4: Age, Sex, Background and Characteristics
Children aren't interchangeable. Individual circumstances affect what arrangements suit them.
| Characteristic | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Age | Developmental stage, approaching milestones |
| Sex | Less determinative than historically; specific needs if relevant |
| Background | Cultural heritage, religion, language, traditions |
| Other characteristics | Disability, health conditions, aptitudes, vulnerabilities |
What This Means for Your Case
Think about what makes your children individuals:
- Special educational needs you're better placed to support
- Cultural heritage you can maintain
- Health conditions you understand and manage
- Particular interests or vulnerabilities
Factor 5: Any Harm Suffered or At Risk
Protecting children from harm is fundamental. Courts consider both past harm and future risk.
Definition of Harm
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Physical abuse | Violence, physical punishment, neglect |
| Emotional abuse | Persistent criticism, rejection, threats |
| Sexual abuse | Any sexual activity with a child |
| Witnessing domestic abuse | Exposure to violence between parents |
| Neglect | Failure to meet basic needs |
"The court must have regard to any harm which the child has suffered or is at risk of suffering. This includes harm from witnessing domestic abuse." — Children Act 1989, Section 1(3)(e)
What This Means for Your Case
- If raising concerns, be specific with evidence—vague allegations can be counterproductive.
- If allegations are against you, take them seriously. Denial without explanation is rarely persuasive. If there's some truth, acknowledge what happened and demonstrate change.
- Courts may order fact-finding hearings to determine disputed allegations.
Factor 6: Parental Capability
This isn't about which parent is "better"—it's about practical capability to meet these children's needs.
Capability Considerations
| Factor | What Courts Examine |
|---|---|
| Health | Mental and physical health affecting parenting capacity |
| Lifestyle | Work patterns, living arrangements, support networks |
| Skills | Parenting approaches, consistency, understanding children |
| Prioritisation | Ability to put children's needs first |
| Supporting relationship | Willingness to facilitate relationship with other parent |
The Implacable Hostility Issue
Courts are particularly interested in willingness to support children's relationships with both parents.
A capable parent who undermines the child's relationship with the other parent may be viewed less favourably than a less capable parent who promotes it.
Factor 7: Range of Powers Available
Judges consider not just ideal arrangements, but what orders are actually available.
Available Orders
| Order Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Child Arrangements Order | Who child lives with and spends time with |
| Specific Issue Order | Deciding particular questions (schooling, medical) |
| Prohibited Steps Order | Preventing specific actions |
| No Order | If better for child than making an order |
The No Order Principle
Section 1(5) Children Act 1989 states courts should not make orders unless doing so is better for the child than making no order.
Applying the Checklist to Your Case
Practical Steps
- Go through each factor and consider how it applies
- Identify your strengths under each heading
- Anticipate challenges the other side might raise
- Gather evidence relevant to key factors
- Frame arguments in welfare terms, not personal grievances
Preparing Your Welfare Evidence: When building your case around the welfare checklist, organised documentation is essential. BundleCreator.co helps you structure evidence by category—children's needs, your capability, any concerns—with proper pagination and indexing.
In Your Statements
Reference the welfare checklist explicitly in position statements and witness statements. Show the court you understand the framework.
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It's Problematic |
|---|---|
| Focusing on rights rather than welfare | Courts care about children's welfare, not parents' rights |
| Personal attacks | Criticising the person rather than analysing parenting |
| Ignoring difficult factors | Courts notice evasion; address weaknesses head-on |
| Overstating children's wishes | Wishes matter but aren't determinative |
| Underestimating status quo | Change requires justification |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the welfare checklist?
The welfare checklist is the seven factors set out in Section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989 that courts must consider when making decisions about children. It ensures all relevant considerations are addressed.
Is the child's welfare the only consideration?
Yes. Section 1(1) states the child's welfare is the court's paramount consideration. Parents' interests are relevant only insofar as they affect children's welfare.
How much weight do children's wishes carry?
It depends on age and maturity. Young children's wishes carry little weight; teenagers' views are taken seriously. But wishes are never determinative—they're one factor among seven.
What if the welfare factors conflict?
Judges weigh factors and exercise judgement. Different considerations may point in different directions. The court reaches a decision based on the overall welfare assessment.
How do I present my case using the welfare checklist?
Address each relevant factor explicitly in your evidence. Show how your proposals serve the child's welfare under each heading. Focus on the child, not on criticising the other parent.
Does past harm automatically affect outcomes?
Not automatically. Courts consider whether risks persist. A parent who harmed their child but has genuinely changed may pose less concern than one who continues to deny problems.
Your Welfare Checklist Action Plan
- Study Section 1(3) – understand each factor thoroughly
- Apply each factor – how does it relate to your specific children?
- Gather supporting evidence – for each factor where you're strong
- Address weaknesses – acknowledge and explain, don't evade
- Frame everything around welfare – not rights or fairness
- Prepare organised documentation – use BundleCreator.co for court-ready bundles
- Reference the checklist explicitly – in statements and submissions
This guide provides general information about the welfare checklist in England and Wales. It is not legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, consult a qualified family solicitor.
Sources:
Ready to Create Your Bundle?
BundleCreator makes it easy to create Practice Directions compliant court bundles. Start your free trial today.
Start Free TrialFree tools mentioned in this article
Watch the short walkthrough
Short tutorial videos showing the exact BundleCreator features mentioned in this article.
Basics
Getting Started with BundleCreator
A guided tour of BundleCreator — the live activity log on your dashboard, PD-aligned numbering, multimedia evidence uploads, AES-256 encryption, plain-English templates, and timestamped share access. Built for litigants in person and legal professionals across England and Wales.
Onboarding
Creating Your First Bundle
Create a bundle in three clicks — from the dashboard Create Bundle button, through the 23-area-of-law picker, to picking a hearing type and watching the editor open. This walkthrough uses the Pro-tips Starter Bundle as the example so you see the flow without real-case complexity.
Basics
Using Templates Effectively
Over 370 templates across 22 areas of law, written for the UK courts. See how to open a template in the browser editor, type over yellow-highlighted drafting prompts, and produce a polished court document without a blank page to fear.
About the Author
Stevie Hayes
Legal Technology Compliance Specialist & Founder
Former Head of Data Security at Holland & Barrett, a Governance, Risk and Compliance specialist, Stevie brings over 30 years of technology expertise—including delivery for Sky, Disney, and BT—to court bundle compliance. His five years navigating the UK Family Court, both with legal representation and as a litigant in person, revealed the gap between what courts require and what tools deliver.
Areas of Expertise:
ISO 27001 Information Security • Data Security & Compliance • Practice Direction 27A • UK Family Court Procedures