ToLATA court bundle software for UK property disputes
Create professional ToLATA court bundles for cohabitation and co-owner disputes. Our software produces paginated, indexed Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA) bundles ready for court. Designed for UK solicitors, barristers, and litigants in person running ToLATA claims.
Every stop on the journey explains the step, with a template, official form or hearing bundle wherever one is needed
What is BundleCreator ToLATA court bundle software?
BundleCreator is ToLATA court bundle software UK designed for property disputes under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA). Our ToLATA property dispute bundle creator automates Section 15 factor organisation, pagination, and formatting for CPR Part 7 and Part 8 claims. Create cohabitation property dispute court bundles, beneficial interest claim bundles, and property co-owner dispute bundles. Features include ToLATA e-bundle for property disputes and DIY ToLATA court bundle online support.
Used by Solicitors, Barristers, McKenzie Friends, and Litigants in Person
Built for CPR Part 7 and Part 8 claims
From £29.99 Per Bundle
Your ToLATA Case Journey
Select your case stage
Each stop is a step in the journey. Large rings are hearings where you build a court bundle; small grey dots are steps you file or take, hollow dots are deadlines or events, and diamonds are forms. The key below the map explains every symbol. Click any stop to see what it involves.
Stops:Decision hearing — the court or tribunal decides the case here; bundle requiredOptional hearing — dashed ring: only held in some casesProcess step — something you file or do, no bundleMilestone — a deadline or event; nothing to prepareOptional step — dashed: not always applicable (e.g. only if needed or agreed)Form-filing endpoint — apply on an official court form (for example a warrant, an enforcement order or a consent order)Mediation step — mediation, a MIAM or early conciliation happens here
Reading:Blog Insight — purple book icons link to a related article (opens in a new tab)
Timing:⚠ 14 daysstatutory — miss this and lose4 weeksrequired noticetyp. 8motypical wait
Laws:This journey summarises the procedure under Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, ss.12–15 and s.23(3) (High Court or County Court only), Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17; Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53; Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17; Hudson v Hathway [2022] EWCA Civ 1648, Limitation Act 1980 s.21(1)(b) and (3) (no limitation period to recover trust property from a trustee; delay may still bar relief), CPR 44.2 (costs follow the event; not the financial remedy rule in FPR 28.3(5)), Family Law Act 1996 Part IV, ss.33–38 (occupation orders, Family Court), CPR Parts 7, 8 (r.8.9(c)), 10, 15, 26, 35, 40 (rr.40.16–40.17), 52, CPR r.39.5 and Practice Direction 32 para 27 (trial bundles), Senior Courts Act 1981 s.39; County Courts Act 1984 s.38 and CPR Parts 70–73 and 83 (enforcement). General information only — not legal advice.
TOLATA is the civil-court route for unmarried cohabitants and other co-owners disputing beneficial interest in property. It is NOT the route for divorcing or dissolving civil-partner couples — they use the discretionary financial-remedy jurisdiction under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 / Civil Partnership Act 2004 in the Family Court. Costs in TOLATA follow the civil rule (CPR 44.2(2)(a) — costs follow the event), not the financial remedy rule in FPR 28.3(5).
The map shows BOTH sides of a TOLATA claim. The claimant route runs from CMC through PTR, trial, and consequential orders. The respondent route — typically the legal owner where the claimant claims a beneficial interest, or the equitable beneficiary where the claimant seeks order for sale — runs in parallel: AoS + defence (⚠14/28 days), occupation-rent counterclaim, defendant expert valuation, shared trial. Both meet at trial and consequential orders.
TOLATA claims resolve disputes over beneficial interests in property. Pre-action: letter before claim under the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct. PD Pre-Action Conduct para 6(b): 14 days (straightforward) to no more than 3 months (very complex). Genuine ADR engagement is expected.
Forum: normally the County Court: TOLATA claims are not specialist Business and Property Courts work unless combined with other specialist claims (PD 57AA; Chancery Guide paras 27.8–27.9); both courts have jurisdiction (TOLATA s.23(3)). Cases raising points of particular novelty or complexity may go to the High Court, Chancery Division (the Business and Property Division from 1 October 2026: SI 2026/723). The Family Court has no TOLATA jurisdiction. Proceedings issue under CPR Part 7 (where facts are disputed — common intention, contributions, detrimental reliance — leading authorities Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, and for mixed domestic/commercial purchases Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17) or Part 8 (where there is no substantial factual dispute — e.g. clear declared trust, application solely for s.14 order for sale).
Limitation: a beneficiary's action to recover trust property from the trustee has no statutory limitation period (Limitation Act 1980 s.21(1)(b)); most other trust claims have six years (s.21(3)); delay can still bar relief (laches, acquiescence).
Outcomes at trial: declaration of beneficial interest (X%), order for sale under s.14 TOLATA, orders under s.14 about occupation (the trustees' s.13 powers, including compensation under s.13(6)), equitable accounting balance (occupation rent, improvement contributions — Stack v Dowden at [93]–[94]; Murphy v Gooch), proprietary estoppel remedy, constructive trust declared, claim dismissed (legal title prevails).
Enforcement: a s.14 order DIRECTS sale but is not self-executing — where a co-owner refuses to execute the TR1 the court appoints another person to sign under Senior Courts Act 1981 s.39 (County Courts Act 1984 s.38 in the County Court), and may order a party to give up possession to the purchaser (CPR 40.16–40.17). The accounting balance is enforced via the standard 5-instrument money-judgment fan if unpaid.
Important: This journey map shows the typical stages of the relevant court or tribunal proceedings. It is general information, not legal advice. Every case is different. For advice about your specific situation, consult a solicitor or instruct a barrister directly.
The law, court fees and time limits can change. We work hard to keep this map accurate, but it may contain errors or become out of date, so please check anything important against the official source — for example legislation.gov.uk or GOV.UK. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Steleo Publishing Limited does not accept liability for any loss arising from reliance on this map. Each stop represents a stage where a separate bundle may be required; BundleCreator handles the formatting — it does not replace professional legal advice.
Share this journey map
Share the whole journey — title, map, key and laws — as a single image.
A TOLATA bundle is a court document package for property disputes under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. BundleCreator is online court bundle software that formats Part 8 claim evidence into PDFs built around PD27A requirements for County Court hearings.
Last reviewed: 27 September 2026 by Stevie Hayes
What to look for in court bundle software for cohabitation and TOLATA disputes
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 claims sit at the boundary of family and Chancery work. Bundle software should handle the specific evidential needs of beneficial-interest, common-intention, and constructive-trust cases. These are the features to weigh up.
CPR Part 8 procedural framing
TOLATA section 14 applications are typically issued under CPR Part 8 in the County Court or Chancery Division (or under the FPR where linked to family proceedings). Software should produce a bundle structured around the Part 8 evidence-on-the-papers route, distinct from the Part 7 trial-bundle structure.
Beneficial-interest evidence sections
Templates with placeholders for the specific evidence TOLATA cases turn on — declarations of trust, mortgage history, payment records for deposit and instalments, contemporaneous correspondence, and witness statements on common intention.
Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott authorities pre-loaded
A skeleton-argument scaffold that walks through the leading authorities (Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53), so the bundle is ready for a hearing structured around them.
Chancery-style chronology builder
TOLATA cases are built on long chronologies of property dealings. Software should let you build a master chronology cross-referenced to bundle pages and export it cleanly with the bundle.
Litigant-in-person friendly first-time experience
Many TOLATA claims are run by separating cohabitants without family-law representation. Software should make sense without assuming legal training.
UK data residency and AES-256 encryption at rest
Property dispute bundles contain mortgage account numbers, bank records, and contemporaneous personal correspondence. Keep that data UK-resident, encrypted at rest with AES-256, and in transit over TLS 1.3.
Transparent pricing without a sales call
A 7-day trial and published pricing means you can evaluate the tool against an actual cohabitation dispute before committing.
UK TOLATA claims key facts, 2026
Primary UK references on Trusts of Land applications, fees, and the constructive-trust framework.
Stat
Value
Source
Governing statute
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
Understanding TOLATA: Property Disputes for Unmarried Couples
A guide to Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 claims, beneficial interest, and forcing the sale of property in England & Wales
Understanding TOLATA Claims and Property Rights
In England and Wales, unmarried couples do not have the same automatic property rights as married couples. If a dispute arises over home ownership or equity, a claim is made under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).
TOLATA provides a legal framework for resolving disputes between co-owners of property, whether they are former cohabitants, family members, or business partners. The court can determine each party's beneficial interest and make orders for sale or occupation.
Can I Force the Sale of a Property Under TOLATA?
Yes. A TOLATA claim allows a co-owner (or someone with a beneficial interest) to ask the court to declare their share of the property or to force a sale so that equity can be released.
Under Section 14 of TOLATA, any person with an interest in property can apply to court for an order. The court will then consider the Section 15 factors, including the intentions of the parties, the welfare of any children, and the interests of any secured creditors such as mortgage lenders.
How Does Beneficial Interest Arise?
Beneficial interest in property may arise in several ways, even if your name is not on the legal title. Understanding these legal concepts is essential for building your case.
Resulting trust: Based on direct financial contributions to the purchase price or deposit
Constructive trust: Based on common intention (express or inferred) combined with detrimental reliance
Proprietary estoppel: Where you relied on assurances about the property to your detriment
The TOLATA Claim Process
TOLATA claims follow the Civil Procedure Rules (Part 7, or Part 8 where the facts are not substantially disputed), not the Family Procedure Rules. This means the process differs from family court proceedings, with different forms, timescales, and costs rules.
Letter before claim: Formal notice sent to the other party setting out your claim and inviting negotiation (Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct)
Evidence Gathering: Proving 'beneficial interest' through financial contributions, written agreements, or evidence of common intention
The Court Bundle: Compiling documents including the claim form (N1 or N208), witness statements, Land Registry documents, and financial records
What is a TOLATA Claim?: In Brief
A TOLATA claim is a legal action under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA) to resolve property disputes between co-owners. Claims typically arise when unmarried couples separate, when family members dispute property ownership, or when one co-owner wants to force a sale. The court can make orders for sale, determine beneficial interests, or decide who can occupy the property. TOLATA claims are brought under CPR Part 7 (Form N1) or, where the facts are not substantially disputed, Part 8 (Form N208).
Scenario: A cohabitation breakdown where one party seeks an order for sale and declaration of beneficial interest. The parties lived together for 8 years, with both contributing to the mortgage, but only one name is on the legal title.
What BundleCreator does: Produces a paginated, indexed ToLATA bundle ready for court containing:
✓ N208 Claim Form and witness statements
✓ Land Registry title documents
✓ Evidence of financial contributions
✓ Bank statements showing mortgage payments
✓ Property valuation evidence
✓ Correspondence showing common intention
Create clear ToLATA bundles for cohabitation and co-owner disputes
Beneficial interest and property ownership dispute bundles with a Section 15 framework, built for CPR Part 7 and Part 8 claims
Section 15 framework
Systematic framework helps you address and evidence each ToLATA Section 15 factor.
Dual Proceedings Support
Specialised template for combined ToLATA and Schedule 1 Children Act applications.
Case Law Integration
Built-in guidance from Stack v Dowden, Jones v Kernott and Marr v Collie.
Pre-action conduct
Complete ADR documentation and tracking of the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct steps to reduce the risk of costs sanctions.
Built for CPR Part 7 and Part 8 claims
Documents organised for CPR Part 7 or Part 8 claims, with bundle preparation aligned with CPR rule 39.5 and Practice Direction 32 para 27. PD27A is the Family Procedure Rules bundle practice direction and does not apply to TOLATA claims.
Smart Pagination
Automatic continuous pagination with intelligent section breaks and cross-referencing.
How Much Time Will You Save?
Compare manual bundle preparation with BundleCreator automation
Task
Manual
BundleCreator
Document pagination
2-4 hours
2 mins
Index creation
1-2 hours
Automatic
Hyperlink insertion
30-60 mins
Automatic
Format checks against court rules
1 hour
Built-in
Total time
4-8 hours
~10 mins
Based on typical UK family court bundle preparation. Times may vary depending on document volume and complexity.
Three Steps to Court-Ready Bundles
1
Choose Template
Select from Pre-Action, CMC, PTR, or Final Hearing templates
2
Upload Documents
Add Land Registry docs, statements, valuations, and evidence
3
Export Bundle
Download your indexed, paginated bundle ready for court
ToLATA property dispute bundle templates
Pre-configured templates for every stage of your TOLATA claim, from pre-action conduct to final hearing
Pre-Action Conduct Bundle
Strategic bundle for ADR attempts and the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct steps before issuing proceedings.
Letter before claimMediation InfoExpert Evidence
ToLATA General Bundle
Standard bundle for Trusts of Land beneficial interest disputes.
N208Witness StatementLand Registry
CMC Bundle
Optimised for Case Management Conference and track allocation.
N208N244Case Summary
ToLATA with Schedule 1
Dual-application bundle when children's housing is affected.
N208C100Schedule 1 App
PTR Bundle
Pre-trial preparation for multi-track ToLATA cases.
Skeleton ArgumentTrial Bundle Index
Final Hearing Bundle
Comprehensive bundle with all evidence for contested hearings.
Essential documents for proving beneficial interest in property. Download or use interactively to organise your evidence.
22 items*6 required
1Property Ownership Evidence
Land Registry official copies (title register)Required
Land Registry title planRequired
Original purchase documents/contract
Declaration of trust (if any)
Cohabitation agreement (if any)
2Financial Contribution Evidence
Mortgage application and offerRequired
Bank statements showing deposit paymentRequired
Mortgage payment history
Evidence of home improvements paid for
Bills and household costs paid
3Common Intention Evidence
Text messages/emails about property
Witness statements from family/friends
Joint financial planning documents
Evidence of discussions about ownership
4Valuation and Market Evidence
Current property valuation (RICS surveyor)Required
Estate agent valuations
Outstanding mortgage statement
Equity calculation
5Pre-action conduct
Letter before claim sentRequired
Response to letter before claim
Evidence of mediation attempts
Without prejudice correspondence (keep out of the court bundle)
Built for solicitors, barristers, and litigants in person across the UK
Civil Procedure Rules vs Family Procedure Rules: Why It Matters
TOLATA claims are civil claims; linked children's claims are family proceedings. Understanding the procedural differences is essential for effective bundle preparation.
CPR
Civil Procedure Rules
TOLATA claims are civil proceedings under CPR Part 7 or Part 8; Part 8 claims are treated as allocated to the multi-track (CPR 8.9(c)).
•Form N1 (Part 7) or N208 (Part 8) claim form (not C100)
•CPR Part 8 procedure (written evidence focus) where the facts are not substantially disputed
•Cost rulesgenerally "loser pays"
•Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct expects an ADR attempt
When TOLATA Meets Family Law: Combined Proceedings
Where unmarried parents separate and there are both property and child issues, the TOLATA claim (County Court) and a Schedule 1 claim (Family Court) cannot be consolidated but can be heard together by a judge authorised in both courts (W v W [2003] EWCA Civ 924):
1.TOLATA + Schedule 1 Children Act 1989: Property orders affecting children's housing may be heard at the same time
2.Bundle organisation: Use separate sections for each proceeding type, with clear labelling
3.Procedural rules: The court may apply different rules to different aspects of the case
BundleCreator's "TOLATA with Schedule 1" template handles these dual-proceeding requirements automatically.
Understanding Key TOLATA Concepts
Technical explanations of property law principles with authoritative sources
Beneficial Interest
A beneficial interest is the right to benefit from property even if you're not on the legal title. It can arise from financial contributions, common intention, or a declaration of trust.
A constructive trust arises when it would be unconscionable for the legal owner to deny another person's interest. It's based on common intention and detrimental reliance (Stack v Dowden, Jones v Kernott).
Section 14 TOLATA allows anyone with an interest in property to apply to court for orders including sale, partition, or determining who can occupy the property.
When making orders, the court must consider: the intentions of the parties, the purposes for which the property is held, the welfare of any children, and the interests of any secured creditor.
Understanding the potential costs of a TOLATA claim helps you budget and make informed decisions. Costs vary based on complexity and whether the case settles or goes to trial.
Cost Type
Typical Range
Notes
Court Fee (County Court)
£387
Non-money claim issue fee (GOV.UK EX50, 13 July 2026)
Court Fee (High Court)
£663
Non-money claim issue fee (GOV.UK EX50, 13 July 2026)
Simple Case (settlement)
Varies
Settles at mediation or CMC
Moderate Case
Varies
PTR and possible trial
Complex Case (full trial)
Varies
Expert evidence, multi-day trial
Property Valuation
Varies
RICS surveyor valuation
Mediation
Varies
Per party, half-day session
Legal costs vary widely with complexity;ask any solicitor or barrister for a written estimate. Using BundleCreator can reduce the time your solicitor spends on bundle preparation, which may reduce the legal fees billed for that work. Actual savings depend on your case complexity, your solicitor's hourly rate, and how much of the bundle work you do yourself.
Where beneficial interests are established, the court may order an equitable accounting to determine each party's share. This complex process requires detailed financial evidence.
Contributions to Acquisition
Direct financial contributions towards the purchase price or deposit create a presumed resulting trust interest proportionate to the contribution (Dyer v Dyer (1788) 2 Cox Eq Cas 92).
Bundle evidence: Deposit payments, completion statements, mortgage records
Mortgage Contributions
Regular mortgage payments may establish or increase beneficial interest, particularly where combined with common intention (Stack v Dowden [2007], Jones v Kernott [2011]).
Bundle evidence: Bank statements, mortgage statements, payment schedules
Improvements & Expenditure
Significant improvements adding lasting value may be relevant, though ordinary maintenance and repairs typically are not (work on the property was held insufficient to infer a common intention in Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107).
Where one co-owner remains in exclusive occupation, they may be accountable for occupation rent to the excluded party (TOLATA s.13(6); Stack v Dowden at [93]–[94]; Re Byford [2003] EWHC 1267 (Ch); French v Barcham [2008] EWHC 1505 (Ch)).
Bundle evidence: Date of exclusion, rental comparables, market rent evidence
Case Law: The Modern Approach to Beneficial Interests
The Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott [2011] established the modern framework for determining beneficial interests in domestic property:
In joint names cases the starting point is equal shares (Jones v Kernott at [51(1)])
If no express intention, infer from whole course of conduct
Imputation (a fair share) applies only to the size of shares, never to whether a shared intention existed (Jones v Kernott at [51(4)]; Capehorn v Harris [2015] EWCA Civ 955 at [17])
The "common intention constructive trust" remains the primary doctrine
Key authorities: Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17
Comprehensive Compliance Resource
A Guide to UK Court Bundle Compliance
For complete guidance on bundle requirements across family and civil proceedings, including the distinctions between PD27A and CPR requirements, consult our authoritative master guide.
As a litigant in person, BundleCreator was invaluable. What would have taken days of stress, I completed confidently in hours. My 361 page bundle packed with large images had been 56MB and amazingly BundleCreator compressed it to only 15MB.
SI
Sammy I.
Litigant in Person, Manchester, UK
Free tools for your case
Picked for trusts of land disputes and cohabitation property claims.
Common questions about TOLATA claims and property dispute bundles
BundleCreator's TOLATA template handles Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 claims for cohabitation property disputes: the claim form (N1 or N208), declaration of trust evidence (where exists), schedules of contributions, communications between the parties on the property's beneficial ownership, mortgage statements, completion correspondence, witness statements, and authorities. The output is paginated continuously, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index, and bookmarked — ready for the County Court or Chancery Division. From £19.99 a month with no per-bundle fee.
TOLATA Part 8 claims (under CPR Part 8 — claims unlikely to involve a substantial dispute of fact (CPR 8.1(2)); disputed beneficial-interest claims usually use Part 7) need: the Part 8 claim form, the witness evidence in support (replacing particulars of claim under Part 8 procedure), the title documents (Land Registry official copies, conveyance, completion statement), schedule of contributions, communications evidencing common intention, and authorities. BundleCreator's TOLATA template orders these for the County Court or Chancery Division.
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 and Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 set out the modern approach to beneficial interests in jointly-owned property: the starting presumption (joint legal title = joint beneficial title) can be rebutted by evidence of common intention to share unequally. BundleCreator's TOLATA template structures the evidence around the Stack v Dowden / Jones v Kernott factors: financial contributions (purchase, mortgage, improvements), parties' relationship and discussions, household and outgoings arrangements, treatment of the property in joint affairs, and any later changes of intention.
A TOLATA schedule of contributions tabulates each party's financial input: deposit, purchase price contributions, mortgage payments (split by capital and interest), improvements and renovations, household expenses, child-related expenses, and any post-separation contributions. BundleCreator's TOLATA template includes a schedule of contributions slot at the front of the bundle, with hyperlinks from each row to the supporting bank statement, mortgage statement, or invoice in the evidence sections.
Pre-action TOLATA bundles for the Letter Before Claim stage (under the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols) need: the Letter Before Claim, the proposed beneficial-interest position, schedule of contributions, key supporting documents (title deeds, mortgage statements, communications), and the proposed remedies (declaration of trust, order for sale, accounting). BundleCreator's TOLATA template handles the pre-action stage and progresses to the trial bundle with continuous outputs.
Where a declaration of trust exists, the bundle must include: the executed declaration of trust, the conveyance or transfer, evidence of any post-execution variations or oral agreements relied on, witness statements on the parties' understanding, and authorities on the construction and rectification of trust deeds. BundleCreator's TOLATA template orders these for the Chancery Division or County Court with paginated, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index output.
BundleCreator's TOLATA template handles tight trial deadlines: upload the Part 8 claim or Part 7 particulars (as appropriate), title documents, schedule of contributions, witness statements, expert valuation evidence, key correspondence, and authorities. The output is a paginated, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index, bookmarked bundle in 30-60 minutes from upload — typically far quicker than manual assembly.
Property valuation evidence in TOLATA disputes typically comes from a chartered surveyor (RICS Red Book methodology). The bundle should include: the surveyor's instruction letter, the surveyor's report (current value, value at relevant historic dates, contribution analysis), the expert's statement of understanding of duty and statement of truth (PD 35 paras 3.2(9) and 3.3), comparable evidence used, and any joint statement from opposing surveyors. BundleCreator's TOLATA template orders these with hyperlinks from valuation conclusions to the underlying comparable evidence.
Works on any website. No account required. Includes “Powered by BundleCreator” branding.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best bundle tool for a TOLATA trial — cohabitation property dispute?
BundleCreator's TOLATA template handles Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 claims for cohabitation property disputes: the claim form (N1 or N208), declaration of trust evidence (where exists), schedules of contributions, communications between the parties on the property's beneficial ownership, mortgage statements, completion correspondence, witness statements, and authorities. The output is paginated continuously, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index, and bookmarked — ready for the County Court or Chancery Division. From £19.99 a month with no per-bundle fee.
How do I prepare a TOLATA Part 8 claim bundle?
TOLATA Part 8 claims (under CPR Part 8 — claims unlikely to involve a substantial dispute of fact (CPR 8.1(2)); disputed beneficial-interest claims usually use Part 7) need: the Part 8 claim form, the witness evidence in support (replacing particulars of claim under Part 8 procedure), the title documents (Land Registry official copies, conveyance, completion statement), schedule of contributions, communications evidencing common intention, and authorities. BundleCreator's TOLATA template orders these for the County Court or Chancery Division.
How do I bundle Stack v Dowden / Jones v Kernott evidence for a constructive trust claim?
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 and Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 set out the modern approach to beneficial interests in jointly-owned property: the starting presumption (joint legal title = joint beneficial title) can be rebutted by evidence of common intention to share unequally. BundleCreator's TOLATA template structures the evidence around the Stack v Dowden / Jones v Kernott factors: financial contributions (purchase, mortgage, improvements), parties' relationship and discussions, household and outgoings arrangements, treatment of the property in joint affairs, and any later changes of intention.
How do I prepare a schedule of contributions for a TOLATA bundle template?
A TOLATA schedule of contributions tabulates each party's financial input: deposit, purchase price contributions, mortgage payments (split by capital and interest), improvements and renovations, household expenses, child-related expenses, and any post-separation contributions. BundleCreator's TOLATA template includes a schedule of contributions slot at the front of the bundle, with hyperlinks from each row to the supporting bank statement, mortgage statement, or invoice in the evidence sections.
How do I prepare a Letter Before Claim TOLATA bundle?
Pre-action TOLATA bundles for the Letter Before Claim stage (under the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols) need: the Letter Before Claim, the proposed beneficial-interest position, schedule of contributions, key supporting documents (title deeds, mortgage statements, communications), and the proposed remedies (declaration of trust, order for sale, accounting). BundleCreator's TOLATA template handles the pre-action stage and progresses to the trial bundle with continuous outputs.
How do I bundle declaration of trust evidence for a co-owner dispute?
Where a declaration of trust exists, the bundle must include: the executed declaration of trust, the conveyance or transfer, evidence of any post-execution variations or oral agreements relied on, witness statements on the parties' understanding, and authorities on the construction and rectification of trust deeds. BundleCreator's TOLATA template orders these for the Chancery Division or County Court with paginated, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index output.
How do I prepare a TOLATA County Court trial bundle on a deadline next week?
BundleCreator's TOLATA template handles tight trial deadlines: upload the Part 8 claim or Part 7 particulars (as appropriate), title documents, schedule of contributions, witness statements, expert valuation evidence, key correspondence, and authorities. The output is a paginated, OCR'd, hyperlinked-index, bookmarked bundle in 30-60 minutes from upload — typically far quicker than manual assembly.
How do I prepare a property valuation evidence bundle for a TOLATA trial?
Property valuation evidence in TOLATA disputes typically comes from a chartered surveyor (RICS Red Book methodology). The bundle should include: the surveyor's instruction letter, the surveyor's report (current value, value at relevant historic dates, contribution analysis), the expert's statement of understanding of duty and statement of truth (PD 35 paras 3.2(9) and 3.3), comparable evidence used, and any joint statement from opposing surveyors. BundleCreator's TOLATA template orders these with hyperlinks from valuation conclusions to the underlying comparable evidence.
BundleCreator helps you prepare and organise documents for court and tribunal hearings. We are not a law firm and we do not give legal advice. Wherever you can, please get advice from a qualified legal adviser before your hearing. Read more
Ready to Create Your ToLATA Bundle?
Built for solicitors, barristers, McKenzie Friends, and litigants in person across England and Wales. From just £29.99 per bundle — no subscription required.
